Does the complexity of precedent make the law less accessible to the public?

Nov 27, 2023 ... Case precedents that courts are bound to follow in subsequent cases are referred to as mandatory or binding authority. decisions that would otherwise be binding precedent when those deci- sions are "clearly irreconcilable with the reasoning or theory of inter- vening higher ... Sep 20, 2024 ... The opinion of an appellate court is binding precedent (mandatory authority) for all lower courts in its jurisdiction. For example, a South ... As arbitration increases in popularity, its deficiencies have become more apparent. The lack of binding precedent in arbitration is convenient in some ways, but ... Feb 27, 2024 ... Decisions of higher courts become a binding precedent for lower courts within their geographic region. Lower courts must follow binding ... Jan 12, 2021 ... ... binding rules; the facts in a particular case may be so atypical as to counsel against creating binding precedent for all later cases; or ... Apr 10, 2024 ... Although Binding Precedent 10 was issued by the Supreme Court more than 15 years ago, there are still judges who fail to observe it and lawyers ... These decisions do not bind the court to a particular interpretation of the law, nor do they make law. In fact, in some jurisdictions employing a version of. May 1, 2024 ... A Common Law for the Age of Amici: How the Party-Presentation Principle Can Help Identify Binding Precedent. David S. Coale. Partner, Lynn ... Oct 28, 2018 ... Binding precedents coming only from higher courts are meant to save the judge from the burden of looking into every past decision and deciding ...