Does the power of the judiciary to interpret and apply precedent give them a law-making role?

Michigan Supreme Court orders “that include a decision with an understandable rationale establish binding precedent.” People v Giovannini, 271 Mich App 409 ... Jul 18, 2024 ... Precedent decisions are legally binding on the DHS components responsible for enforcing immigration laws in all proceedings involving the ... Thus, a decision by the California Supreme Court is binding on all lower courts. 1. Page 3. All state cow1s also are bound by United States Supreme Court ... Binding precedent. Precedent that a court must abide by in its adjudication of a case. For example, a lower court is bound by the decision of a higher ... Oct 18, 2000 ... binding precedent of the Trial Section." ) FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior ). Administrative Patent Judge ... could an arbitral award that does not follow a precedent considered binding by Brazilian civil procedural law be annulled in state courts? if the arbitral ... Binding precedent is “[a] precedent that the court must follow,” while persuasive precedent is “[a] precedent that a court may either follow or reject, but ... Feb 27, 2024 ... Decisions of higher courts become a binding precedent for lower courts within their geographic region. Lower courts must follow binding ... The reports of panels and the Appellate Body are not binding precedents for other disputes between the same parties on other matters or different parties on ... Oct 13, 2016 ... TC opinions are binding, precedential, and published by the Tax Court. They generally address issues of first impression, issues that impact a large number of ...