Can different judges interpret the same precedent differently?

Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ... The Board resolves some appeals by issuing dispositive orders. These orders are final for the Department, but they do not serve as binding precedent in other ... Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ... Aug 9, 2022 ... Hence, the defining principle of common law is precedents, which is the requirement that judges must follow binding legal decisions of prior ... May 1, 2024 ... A Common Law for the Age of Amici: How the Party-Presentation Principle Can Help Identify Binding Precedent. David S. Coale. Partner, Lynn ... Settled law” appears frequently in judicial opinions—sometimes to refer to binding precedent, sometimes to denote precedent that has acquired a more ... Aug 18, 2024 ... This doctrine establishes a hierarchical structure of courts wherein decisions rendered by higher courts are binding upon lower courts, ensuring consistency ... An order that is a final Supreme Court disposition of an application and that contains a concise statement of the applicable facts and reasons for the decision ... (impermissibly) treated as binding “precedent.” Page 15. 7. 5. The Appellate Body wrongly claims that its reports are entitled to be treated as binding. Aug 17, 2020 ... A license is a personal right to use the property of another, that applies only to that person, and that can be cancelled at any time by giving notice of ...