Can the appointment of new judges lead to shifts in the interpretation or application of existing precedents?

Binding precedent. Precedent that a court must abide by in its adjudication of a case. For example, a lower court is bound by the decision of a higher ... extent, which is one of the most basic demands of justice. On the other hand, rigid adherence to the doctrine of binding precedent could stulti- fy legal ... Oct 28, 2018 ... Binding precedents coming only from higher courts are meant to save the judge from the burden of looking into every past decision and deciding ... Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ... ... binding doctrine of precedent within the arbitration mechanism. By understanding the present use of precedent along with its benefits and costs, it becomes ... 1 The Eleventh Circuit has adopted as binding precedent all Fifth Circuit decisions issued before October 1, 1981, as well as all decisions issued after ... What is Binding. Precedent? How, when, where, and why courts are obligated to follow decisions by other courts. Page 2. What is Stare Decisis? Stare Decisis is ... Binding precedent refers to a legal principle or rule established in a previous court case that must be followed by lower courts in future cases with similar ... Panel decisions are not binding precedent on other Appeals Board panels and WCJs. However, panel decisions are citable and are considered to the extent that ... They include: 1) Providing clear guidance that Appellate Body reports do not constitute binding precedent, but may, as with panel reports, be cited for ...