What are the consequences if a reviewer's identity is revealed in single blind review?

Jul 18, 2024 ... All manuscripts submitted to Dove Medical Press journals are subject to single-anonymous (previously referred to as single-blind) peer review. They randomly assign each of the 113 reviewers to give either single- or double- blind reviews, and each paper submission receives at least three single-blind ... Sep 3, 2023 ... This study had a randomized, prospective, single-blind design and included patients aged >20 years who underwent cystoscopy in either of two ... The placebo and related effects are central to the single-blind study, and the dangers (or perceived dangers) of bias through participant ... Nov 25, 2013 ... It seemed logical to assume that in single blind peer-review, the reviewer should not disclose his identity without the editor's consent. Dec 13, 2021 ... Microneedling followed by 5-fluorouracil application showed better response than needling alone with minimal side effects and the results were ... Single anonymized review · Knowledge of the author may overshadow the quality of the work, potentially leading to a lack of scrutiny, especially if it's the work ... Sep 27, 2016 ... Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige ... Most medical journals practice single-blind review (authors' ... Jul 10, 2020 ... A double-blind study withholds each subject's group assignment from both the participant and the researcher performing the experiment. single-blind study ... A type of clinical trial in which only the researcher doing the study knows which treatment or intervention the participant is receiving ...