How can the peer review process be designed to foster innovation and the dissemination of groundbreaking research?

Mar 24, 2021 ... To assess whether the type of peer-review (single-blinded vs double-blinded) has an impact on nationality representation in journals. Unblinding that occurs before the conclusion of a study is a source of experimental error, as the bias that was eliminated by blinding is re-introduced. The ... Single anonymized review · Knowledge of the author may overshadow the quality of the work, potentially leading to a lack of scrutiny, especially if it's the work ... ... Study protocol of a randomized multicenter, single-blind trial. Registry ... Institutional Approvals: Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee ... Feb 13, 2013 ... Double-blind reviews imply that both the author and the reviewers are blind, while single-blind reviews imply that reviewers are blind and the author is not. Dec 12, 2024 ... A single-blind randomized controlled pilot study on the potential of neuroathletic training for balance ability in stroke outpatient rehabilitation. Sep 22, 2020 ... Differences between Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review. In single-blind peer review, only the reviewers are anonymous. Reviewers know the ... The editor appointed in 1979 returned the journal to a single-blind system. Page 6. 1046 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW DECEMBER 1991 tion continuing through the ... Sep 3, 2023 ... This study had a randomized, prospective, single-blind design and included patients aged >20 years who underwent cystoscopy in either of two ... Jul 10, 2020 ... A double-blind study withholds each subject's group assignment from both the participant and the researcher performing the experiment.