What are the key factors that should be considered when choosing a peer review model for a particular journal or field?

Oct 12, 2021 ... (2017) designed a similar experiment where papers submitted to a reputable computer science conference were subjected to both single-blind and ... Nov 1, 2020 ... Single-blind review just increases the chance of having reviewers biased racially, religiously, or academically (junior researchers fighting ... Apr 19, 2024 ... In the single-blind peer review process, reviewers are aware of the authors' identities, but authors remain unaware of who the reviewers are. This study is a three-arm single-blinded randomized clinical trial evaluat ing 130 radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis patients suffering from ... Nov 30, 2017 ... Each PC member read his or her assigned papers and entered reviews, again with only single-blind PC members able to see the authors and ... Dec 18, 2016 ... Double-blind means that reviewer names are hidden from authors, and author names are hidden from reviewers. · Single-blind (a.k.a. “blind”) means ... Peer review may be “single-blind,” in which reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of paper authors, or “double-blind,” in which this information ... ... Study protocol of a randomized multicenter, single-blind trial. Registry ... Institutional Approvals: Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee ... Jan 8, 2016 ... Conclusion. Chitosan from fungal origin was able to reduce the mean body weight up to 3 kg during the 90 day study period. Together with this, ... ... single-blind option should be considered. In some cases only an open-label ... blind review. If no procedure for dealing with outliers was foreseen in ...