How can researchers contribute to the ongoing discussion and evaluation of different peer review models?

Sep 27, 2016 ... Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige ... Most medical journals practice single-blind review (authors' ... METHODS: Our research on two different junctional tourniquet models was designed as a prospective randomized, crossover, single-blinded study. All 40 ... Feb 1, 2021 ... There was no statistically significant difference in country-of-origin representation between single-blind journals and double-blind journals. This blinded prospective assessment demonstrates that unilateral GKT is a safe and efficient procedure for severe medically refractory tremor. May 7, 2013 ... Conclusions. This study demonstrated that at the 1-year follow-up, patients with symptomatic AF and AFL who are treated with AF±AFL ablation ... ... Study protocol of a randomized multicenter, single-blind trial. Registry ... Institutional Approvals: Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee ... In single-blind review, reviewers' identities are blinded—that is, not known to authors—though authors' identities are revealed to reviewers at the time of ... Blinding techniques are also used to avoid bias. In a single-blind study the participants do not know what treatment groups they are in, but the researchers ... ... single-blind option should be considered. In some cases only an open-label ... blind review. If no procedure for dealing with outliers was foreseen in ... Jul 18, 2024 ... All manuscripts submitted to Dove Medical Press journals are subject to single-anonymous (previously referred to as single-blind) peer review.