How do journal editors mitigate potential biases in single blind review?

Unblinding that occurs before the conclusion of a study is a source of experimental error, as the bias that was eliminated by blinding is re-introduced. The ... Jul 22, 2022 ... We have been considering whether ESM should keep using a single-blind review process or turn to a double-blind process. Debate continues regarding the merits of single-blind review, in which anonymous reviewers know the authors of a paper and their affiliations, compared with ... Jun 21, 2006 ... Most database journals employ single-blind review- ing, in which the reviewer is unknown to the author, but the identity of the author is ... In single-blind review, reviewers' identities are blinded—that is, not known to authors—though authors' identities are revealed to reviewers at the time of ... Common types of peer review ... This type of peer review is also called 'single-blind review'. In this model, the reviewers know that you are the author of the ... Single-blind review: Authors identities are revealed to all, but reviewer identities are not revealed to authors (also known as anonymous review); Open review: ... Jan 7, 2021 ... ... reviewing policy from single-blind peer review to double-blind peer review in 2018. We find that after switching to double-blind review, the ... Aug 10, 2023 ... Single-blind review is a method used in academic and scientific communities to evaluate the quality and validity of research papers submitted ... Jan 17, 2025 ... ... single-blind feasibility study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05974072). It included 41 participants that were randomly allocated to either the ...