What is the process for appealing a decision made under single blind review?

Jan 17, 2025 ... ... single-blind feasibility study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05974072). It included 41 participants that were randomly allocated to either the ... Feb 13, 2013 ... Double-blind reviews imply that both the author and the reviewers are blind, while single-blind reviews imply that reviewers are blind and the author is not. A second objective was to compare open peer review with single-blind peer review. This study was the first to analyse a large number of reviewer reports ... Jul 17, 2023 ... Single-, double-, and triple-blinding are commonly used blinding strategies in clinical research. A single-blind study masks the subjects ... Sep 27, 2016 ... Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige ... Most medical journals practice single-blind review (authors' ... This blinded prospective assessment demonstrates that unilateral GKT is a safe and efficient procedure for severe medically refractory tremor. Jan 16, 2017 ... All IOP Publishing journals currently use the conventional “single-blind” peer-review model, in which the reviewer is aware of the author's ... The editor appointed in 1979 returned the journal to a single-blind system. Page 6. 1046 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW DECEMBER 1991 tion continuing through the ... Aug 10, 2023 ... Single-blind review is a method used in academic and scientific communities to evaluate the quality and validity of research papers submitted ... They randomly assign each of the 113 reviewers to give either single- or double- blind reviews, and each paper submission receives at least three single-blind ...