Could knowing author identity help reviewers provide more context-specific feedback?

A smaller proportion of invited reviewers agreed to peer review for journals operating under open and single-blind peer review models compared with journals ... Feb 13, 2018 ... Single-blind peer review is a conventional method of peer review where the authors do not know who the reviewers are. However, the reviewers ... Sep 18, 2020 ... But critics of single-blind review say that this knowledge can also negatively bias a reviewer, who may disfavor lesser-known researchers ... Feb 18, 2015 ... Since June 2013, Nature Geoscience and Nature Climate Change have allowed authors to choose between double-blind and single-blind peer review at ... Unblinding that occurs before the conclusion of a study is a source of experimental error, as the bias that was eliminated by blinding is re-introduced. The ... Aug 1, 2021 ... ... Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. IJSPT. 2021;16(4):1025 ... The University Institutional Review Board approved the ethical protocol for ... ... blind reviewing procedure, the Editorial Board was asked for its recommendation. Roughly a third favored retaining single-blind reviewing (SBR), roughly a ... Single anonymized review · Knowledge of the author may overshadow the quality of the work, potentially leading to a lack of scrutiny, especially if it's the work ... Apr 19, 2024 ... In the single-blind peer review process, reviewers are aware of the authors' identities, but authors remain unaware of who the reviewers are. single-blind study ... A type of clinical trial in which only the researcher doing the study knows which treatment or intervention the participant is receiving ...