How can feedback from authors and reviewers be used to continuously improve the peer review process?

Aug 10, 2023 ... Single-blind review is a method used in academic and scientific communities to evaluate the quality and validity of research papers submitted ... Dec 12, 2024 ... A single-blind randomized controlled pilot study on the potential of neuroathletic training for balance ability in stroke outpatient rehabilitation. Jun 25, 2021 ... A single-blind randomised non-inferiority trial comparing heterologous and homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 ... In single-anonymous, the names of the reviewers are not shared with the author, but the reviewers are aware of the author's identity. In double-anonymous, ... Jun 17, 2021 ... Conclusion. In this phase II study of two imetelstat doses, 9.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks demonstrated clinical benefits in symptom response rate ... Jul 22, 2022 ... We have been considering whether ESM should keep using a single-blind review process or turn to a double-blind process. May 16, 2022 ... Ureteral stent materials remain prone to encrustation induced by urine exposure and its contents (ie, ions, microbial biofilm), resulting in accelerated ... A smaller proportion of invited reviewers agreed to peer review for journals operating under open and single-blind peer review models compared with journals ... Feb 9, 2020 ... Online Posting, Single-Blind Review, Open Access, and the Future of Refereed Journals. Louisa HaView all authors and affiliations. Volume 97 ... A second objective was to compare open peer review with single-blind peer review. This study was the first to analyse a large number of reviewer reports ...