Are reviewers more likely to be critical in a single blind review?

Jun 2, 2021 ... STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The selection criteria included randomized controlled trials comparing the double-blind peer review process vs the ... Single-blind review: Authors identities are revealed to all, but reviewer identities are not revealed to authors (also known as anonymous review); Open review: ... They randomly assign each of the 113 reviewers to give either single- or double- blind reviews, and each paper submission receives at least three single-blind ... Jun 4, 2024 ... ... single-blind study format. Continuous monitoring companies were not informed about release timings, such as the start and stop points or the ... May 12, 2022 ... The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness and safety of administration of the combination of midazolam and pethidine during bronchoscopy. Jun 17, 2021 ... Conclusion. In this phase II study of two imetelstat doses, 9.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks demonstrated clinical benefits in symptom response rate ... TIE - Single-Blind review process ... Submission policy has changed on 01 July 2020. TIE has switched to "single-blind" peer review process, where the identities ... ... single-blind option should be considered. In some cases only an open-label ... blind review. If no procedure for dealing with outliers was foreseen in ... Apr 2, 2024 ... Single-blind peer review is commonly used in academic publishing, especially in the sciences and social sciences. In this process, the reviewers ... Aug 10, 2023 ... Single-blind review is a method used in academic and scientific communities to evaluate the quality and validity of research papers submitted ...