What are the arguments in favor of single blind review?

Blank, Rebecca M, 1991. "The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review," American Economic ... Jun 4, 2024 ... ... single-blind study format. Continuous monitoring companies were not informed about release timings, such as the start and stop points or the ... Jan 7, 2021 ... ... reviewing policy from single-blind peer review to double-blind peer review in 2018. We find that after switching to double-blind review, the ... May 7, 2013 ... Conclusions. This study demonstrated that at the 1-year follow-up, patients with symptomatic AF and AFL who are treated with AF±AFL ablation ... Jun 25, 2021 ... A single-blind randomised non-inferiority trial comparing heterologous and homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 ... In single-blind review, reviewers' identities are blinded—that is, not known to authors—though authors' identities are revealed to reviewers at the time of ... Single-blind study ... A single-blind study is a clinical trial design in which in which one party, either the investigator or the participant, does not know ... Single-blind review: Authors identities are revealed to all, but reviewer identities are not revealed to authors (also known as anonymous review); Open review: ... Jun 2, 2021 ... STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The selection criteria included randomized controlled trials comparing the double-blind peer review process vs the ... The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a ...