What is the role of judicial reasoning in the application of binding precedent?

Binding precedent describes law set forth in written appellate court decisions that set the legal standards for lower courts in the same jurisdiction. Precedent ... What is Binding. Precedent? How, when, where, and why courts are obligated to follow decisions by other courts. Page 2. What is Stare Decisis? Stare Decisis is ... Jan 10, 2025 ... Whether the Supreme Court could employ its supervisory power to impose a binding, vertical precedent about horizontal precedent is another ... Sep 12, 2019 ... ... binding precedent. In the view of the United States, the approach taken by the Appellate Body strays from the mandates of WTO dispute ... The doctrine of precedent is the fundamental basis of the law applied by the judiciary, which specifies that a court should apply the rulings of previous cases. Feb 15, 2018 ... Binding precedent refers to case law that courts have to follow. For example, the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States are ... Sep 5, 2012 ... Decisions of the Appellate Term are not binding on the Supreme Court, even if issued within the same judicial department. Oct 28, 2018 ... Binding precedents coming only from higher courts are meant to save the judge from the burden of looking into every past decision and deciding ... Settled law” appears frequently in judicial opinions—sometimes to refer to binding precedent, sometimes to denote precedent that has acquired a more ... The judgment of the Full Bench is binding precedent as it expresses the collective opinion of the Court as such