Is it true that judges are always strictly bound by every aspect of previous decisions?

Feb 15, 2018 ... Binding precedent refers to case law that courts have to follow. For example, the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States are ... The judgment of the Full Bench is binding precedent as it expresses the collective opinion of the Court as such Feb 1, 2023 ... ... binding precedent for lower courts. Whether language in an appellate opinion was central to the decision or only an afterthought, zealous ... An order that is a final Supreme Court disposition of an application and that contains a concise statement of the applicable facts and reasons for the decision ... They include: 1) Providing clear guidance that Appellate Body reports do not constitute binding precedent, but may, as with panel reports, be cited for ... What is Binding. Precedent? How, when, where, and why courts are obligated to follow decisions by other courts. Page 2. What is Stare Decisis? Stare Decisis is ... Thus, a decision by the California Supreme Court is binding on all lower courts. 1. Page 3. All state cow1s also are bound by United States Supreme Court ... Apr 3, 2024 ... In brief. Recently, Labor Inspection Court established an administrative precedent of mandatory observance in relation to the transfer of ... Feb 20, 2025 ... Every U.S. Court of Appeals is a different court regarding mandatory precedent (i.e., the 4th circuit does not bind the 9th circuit) except ... Aug 18, 2024 ... This doctrine establishes a hierarchical structure of courts wherein decisions rendered by higher courts are binding upon lower courts, ensuring consistency ...