What is the balance between legal certainty and legal flexibility in a system based on binding precedent?

Dec 10, 2011 ... The opinion of any one district court is binding and controlling precedent, statewide, on all other lower-level state tribunals. Nov 4, 2010 ... USCIS has announced that two decisions from its Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) will be binding precedent for the agency. These decisions do not bind the court to a particular interpretation of the law, nor do they make law. In fact, in some jurisdictions employing a version of. ... Binding Precedent Agreements for Major Pipeline Project to Deliver New Natural Gas Supplies Into New Jersey and New York Area. Press Release. Printer Friendly ... Michigan Supreme Court orders “that include a decision with an understandable rationale establish binding precedent.” People v Giovannini, 271 Mich App 409 ... Apr 25, 2023 ... Normally, decisions of a District Court of Appeal are not binding on lower courts outside of its jurisdiction, but there is a notable exception ... Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ... Aug 4, 2024 ... Citing various legal instruments and cases, the paper highlights the lack of statutory support for binding precedents in arbitration. An order that is a final Supreme Court disposition of an application and that contains a concise statement of the applicable facts and reasons for the decision ... Feb 4, 2017 ... The jurors determine the facts and reach a verdict, within the guidelines of the law as determined by the judge.