Are there situations where strict adherence to precedent can undermine legal certainty?

Mar 15, 2023 ... Binding precedent – Precedent that a court must abide by in its adjudication of a case. Persuasive precedent – Precedent that a court may ... The decisions of the predecessor boards continue as binding precedent at the CBCA. Fourteen administrative judges appointed by the Administrator of General ... Nov 26, 2024 ... U.S. Supreme Court decisions are binding precedent on all other federal courts and all state courts on questions of constitutional ... extent, which is one of the most basic demands of justice. On the other hand, rigid adherence to the doctrine of binding precedent could stulti- fy legal ... Binding precedent is a legal rule or principle, articulated by an appellate court , that must be followed by lower courts within its jurisdiction . Essentially, ... Binding precedent refers to a legal principle or rule established in a previous court case that must be followed by lower courts in future cases with similar ... Dec 10, 2011 ... The opinion of any one district court is binding and controlling precedent, statewide, on all other lower-level state tribunals. Sep 20, 2024 ... The opinion of an appellate court is binding precedent (mandatory authority) for all lower courts in its jurisdiction. For example, a South ... May 1, 2024 ... A Common Law for the Age of Amici: How the Party-Presentation Principle Can Help Identify Binding Precedent. David S. Coale. Partner, Lynn ... Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab-law tradition' of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law.