Does the need to research and understand complex case law make legal proceedings more expensive?

Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ... Aug 13, 2020 ... was not a binding precedent at all.6 The three dissenting Justices were aghast at Justice Gorsuch's suggestion that a plurality decision ... The rules require that in certain circumstances a decision be followed whether the second court approves of the precedent or not. Thus in Re Schweppes Ltd's ... Apr 10, 2024 ... Although Binding Precedent 10 was issued by the Supreme Court more than 15 years ago, there are still judges who fail to observe it and lawyers ... The doctrine of precedent is the fundamental basis of the law applied by the judiciary, which specifies that a court should apply the rulings of previous cases. Nov 26, 2024 ... The term “precedent” was derived from the doctrine of “stare decisis” with a literal meaning of “standing by what is decided. Nov 26, 2024 ... U.S. Supreme Court decisions are binding precedent on all other federal courts and all state courts on questions of constitutional ... binding precedent, perhaps because the Court has discretion- ary review, meaning that it can manage its caseload and its members will want each of their ... Settled law” appears frequently in judicial opinions—sometimes to refer to binding precedent, sometimes to denote precedent that has acquired a more ... ... binding doctrine of precedent within the arbitration mechanism. By understanding the present use of precedent along with its benefits and costs, it becomes ...