What happens when there are conflicting precedents from courts at the same level in the hierarchy?

Feb 20, 2025 ... Every U.S. Court of Appeals is a different court regarding mandatory precedent (i.e., the 4th circuit does not bind the 9th circuit) except ... Jan 12, 2021 ... ... binding rules; the facts in a particular case may be so atypical as to counsel against creating binding precedent for all later cases; or ... What is Binding. Precedent? How, when, where, and why courts are obligated to follow decisions by other courts. Page 2. What is Stare Decisis? Stare Decisis is ... In common law, precedent can either be something courts must follow (binding) or something they can consider but do not have to follow (persuasive). Civil law ... Nov 27, 2023 ... Case precedents that courts are bound to follow in subsequent cases are referred to as mandatory or binding authority. The legal principle of precedent requires that a prior decision be treated as binding even if the current decision maker disagrees with that decision. Michigan Supreme Court orders “that include a decision with an understandable rationale establish binding precedent.” People v Giovannini, 271 Mich App 409 ... Jul 3, 2007 ... Whether the ruling of the Western Section Court of Appeals in Wells v. Wharton, 2005 WL. 3309651 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005), sets a binding precedent ... Binding precedent is a legal rule or principle, articulated by an appellate court , that must be followed by lower courts within its jurisdiction . Essentially, ... extent, which is one of the most basic demands of justice. On the other hand, rigid adherence to the doctrine of binding precedent could stulti- fy legal ...