What are the techniques used by judges to avoid following a binding precedent?

Aug 9, 2022 ... Hence, the defining principle of common law is precedents, which is the requirement that judges must follow binding legal decisions of prior ... Published Opinions are binding precedent. Unpublished Opinions are not binding precedent. Click to view FRAP 36 and accompanying Eleventh Circuit Rules. The beginning of wisdom may be to recognize the variety of problems that arise in common law systems concerning application of precedents. Binding precedent is a legal rule made by a higher court that lower courts must follow. When a higher court decides a case, it writes down its decision in a ... Feb 1, 2023 ... ... binding precedent for lower courts. Whether language in an appellate opinion was central to the decision or only an afterthought, zealous ... Dec 10, 2011 ... The opinion of any one district court is binding and controlling precedent, statewide, on all other lower-level state tribunals. An order that is a final Supreme Court disposition of an application and that contains a concise statement of the applicable facts and reasons for the decision ... Michigan Supreme Court orders “that include a decision with an understandable rationale establish binding precedent.” People v Giovannini, 271 Mich App 409 ... A precedent is 'binding' on a court if the precedent was made by a superior court that is higher in the hierarchy of courts. A binding precedent must be ... Apr 3, 2024 ... In brief. Recently, Labor Inspection Court established an administrative precedent of mandatory observance in relation to the transfer of ...