How do landmark cases shape the future application of the law?

binding precedent, perhaps because the Court has discretion- ary review, meaning that it can manage its caseload and its members will want each of their ... Binding precedent is a legal rule or principle, articulated by an appellate court , that must be followed by lower courts within its jurisdiction . Essentially, ... Sep 20, 2024 ... The opinion of an appellate court is binding precedent (mandatory authority) for all lower courts in its jurisdiction. For example, a South ... May 16, 2018 ... As Conduragis and Britto show, Rhode Island employers have little definitive guidance to assist them in drafting enforceable arbitration ... As arbitration increases in popularity, its deficiencies have become more apparent. The lack of binding precedent in arbitration is convenient in some ways, but ... Mar 3, 2009 ... We know of no precedent for the proposition that when a plaintiff has sued to challenge the lawfulness of certain action or threatened ... Sep 12, 2019 ... ... binding precedent. In the view of the United States, the approach taken by the Appellate Body strays from the mandates of WTO dispute ... could an arbitral award that does not follow a precedent considered binding by Brazilian civil procedural law be annulled in state courts? if the arbitral ... The decisions of the predecessor boards continue as binding precedent at the CBCA. Fourteen administrative judges appointed by the Administrator of General ... All ICA opinions, orders, or decisions are binding precedent for the decisions of all circuit courts, family courts, magistrate courts, and state ...