Are courts required to follow precedents from other jurisdictions when determining which law should apply to a particular dispute?

Mar 3, 2009 ... We know of no precedent for the proposition that when a plaintiff has sued to challenge the lawfulness of certain action or threatened ... Jul 18, 2024 ... Precedent decisions are legally binding on the DHS components responsible for enforcing immigration laws in all proceedings involving the ... Binding precedent is “[a] precedent that the court must follow,” while persuasive precedent is “[a] precedent that a court may either follow or reject, but ... 1973). Page 22. 808. NEVADA LAW JOURNAL. [Vol. 12:787 binding precedent at the district court level, but at the same time, they do not forbid its creation.150. Apr 3, 2024 ... In brief. Recently, Labor Inspection Court established an administrative precedent of mandatory observance in relation to the transfer of ... The doctrine of precedent is the fundamental basis of the law applied by the judiciary, which specifies that a court should apply the rulings of previous cases. Feb 29, 2024 ... ... precedent of previous decisions. However, a court does not have to stand by a decision that is not binding precedent. Generally courts will ... Feb 15, 2018 ... Binding precedent refers to case law that courts have to follow. For example, the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States are ... Binding precedent is a legal rule made by a higher court that lower courts must follow. When a higher court decides a case, it writes down its decision in a ... They include: 1) Providing clear guidance that Appellate Body reports do not constitute binding precedent, but may, as with panel reports, be cited for ...