What are the limits to the binding force of precedent when it conflicts with fundamental principles of justice?

Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ... Nov 26, 2024 ... The term “precedent” was derived from the doctrine of “stare decisis” with a literal meaning of “standing by what is decided. What is Stare Decisis and Binding Precedent? The concept of stare decisis, Latin for “let the thing stand,” is the doctrine that court decisions generally ... Aug 12, 2019 ... A precedent, in the English Law System, is a previous court decision which another court is bound to follow, by deciding a subsequent case in the same way. Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ... Apr 3, 2024 ... In brief. Recently, Labor Inspection Court established an administrative precedent of mandatory observance in relation to the transfer of ... Binding precedent is a legal rule made by a higher court that lower courts must follow. When a higher court decides a case, it writes down its decision in a ... The doctrine of binding precedent states that all courts bind all lower courts, and some courts also bind themselves. The rules require that in certain circumstances a decision be followed whether the second court approves of the precedent or not. Thus in Re Schweppes Ltd's ... Thus, a decision by the California Supreme Court is binding on all lower courts. 1. Page 3. All state cow1s also are bound by United States Supreme Court ...