How does the English system of binding precedent compare to the systems in other common law countries (e.g., the United States, Canada, Australia)?

The rules require that in certain circumstances a decision be followed whether the second court approves of the precedent or not. Thus in Re Schweppes Ltd's ... May 1, 2024 ... A Common Law for the Age of Amici: How the Party-Presentation Principle Can Help Identify Binding Precedent. David S. Coale. Partner, Lynn ... Oct 28, 2018 ... Binding precedents coming only from higher courts are meant to save the judge from the burden of looking into every past decision and deciding ... The decisions of the predecessor boards continue as binding precedent at the CBCA. Fourteen administrative judges appointed by the Administrator of General ... Nov 27, 2023 ... Case precedents that courts are bound to follow in subsequent cases are referred to as mandatory or binding authority. Binding precedent describes law set forth in written appellate court decisions that set the legal standards for lower courts in the same jurisdiction. Precedent ... Aug 4, 2024 ... Citing various legal instruments and cases, the paper highlights the lack of statutory support for binding precedents in arbitration. The Board resolves some appeals by issuing dispositive orders. These orders are final for the Department, but they do not serve as binding precedent in other ... extent, which is one of the most basic demands of justice. On the other hand, rigid adherence to the doctrine of binding precedent could stulti- fy legal ... Jun 16, 2021 ... This article explores the difference between Jersey and Guernsey law on whether there is a doctrine of binding precedent in respect of decisions of higher ...