How does a decision made per incuriam affect its binding nature?

Dec 10, 2011 ... The opinion of any one district court is binding and controlling precedent, statewide, on all other lower-level state tribunals. Feb 27, 2024 ... Decisions of higher courts become a binding precedent for lower courts within their geographic region. Lower courts must follow binding ... The rules require that in certain circumstances a decision be followed whether the second court approves of the precedent or not. Thus in Re Schweppes Ltd's ... Aug 9, 2022 ... Hence, the defining principle of common law is precedents, which is the requirement that judges must follow binding legal decisions of prior ... Aug 4, 2024 ... Citing various legal instruments and cases, the paper highlights the lack of statutory support for binding precedents in arbitration. Feb 4, 2017 ... The jurors determine the facts and reach a verdict, within the guidelines of the law as determined by the judge. Oct 13, 2016 ... TC opinions are binding, precedential, and published by the Tax Court. They generally address issues of first impression, issues that impact a large number of ... Feb 29, 2024 ... ... precedent of previous decisions. However, a court does not have to stand by a decision that is not binding precedent. Generally courts will ... In common law, precedent can either be something courts must follow (binding) or something they can consider but do not have to follow (persuasive). Civil law ... Binding precedent. adjective. Following the decisions made by higher courts. Lower courts must follow the precedents set by the decisions of higher courts and ...