What are the potential unintended consequences of different peer review models, including single blind review?

Jul 17, 2023 ... Single-, double-, and triple-blinding are commonly used blinding strategies in clinical research. A single-blind study masks the subjects ... A second objective was to compare open peer review with single-blind peer review. This study was the first to analyse a large number of reviewer reports ... May 7, 2013 ... Conclusions. This study demonstrated that at the 1-year follow-up, patients with symptomatic AF and AFL who are treated with AF±AFL ablation ... Short-Term Effectiveness of Ultrasound Treatment in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis: Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Prospective Study. Ceyda ... May 21, 2017 ... What is a single blind or double blind peer review? In a single-blind review, the author does not know who the reviewer(s) is/are, but the ... ... study was single blind (expert cytopathologist) and naïve Paris system for urine cytology assessment was used. Furthermore, additional cytological ... Apr 14, 2022 ... The double-blind peer review process seemed to be associated with an 18% lower manuscript acceptance rate than the single-blind peer review process. A smaller proportion of invited reviewers agreed to peer review for journals operating under open and single-blind peer review models compared with journals ... TIE - Single-Blind review process ... Submission policy has changed on 01 July 2020. TIE has switched to "single-blind" peer review process, where the identities ... But, according to Brown, the editors felt that trying to hide every single author identity would probably be unsuccessful, and authors too recognizable, to be ...