What are the methodological challenges of studying the effects of peer review models?

IEEE-HPEC paper reviews are to be conducted in a single-blind manner. That is, the reviewers remain anonymous, while the paper author list and author ... The placebo and related effects are central to the single-blind study, and the dangers (or perceived dangers) of bias through participant ... Jul 22, 2022 ... We have been considering whether ESM should keep using a single-blind review process or turn to a double-blind process. ... reviewed via a double-blind review process. Demo papers must be accompanied by a conference demonstration (see details below), and can be reviewed via a single ... Sep 18, 2019 ... Alternatively, in a “single-blind” review process, only the reviewers are anonymous to the authors. ... Most chemistry-related journals use a ... Jun 25, 2021 ... A single-blind randomised non-inferiority trial comparing heterologous and homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 ... Sep 22, 2020 ... Differences between Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review. In single-blind peer review, only the reviewers are anonymous. Reviewers know the ... Jun 20, 2019 ... In a single-blind review, the reviewers (or referees) know whose manuscript they are reviewing, but the names of the reviewers are kept secret ... The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a ... Aug 10, 2023 ... Single-blind review is a method used in academic and scientific communities to evaluate the quality and validity of research papers submitted ...