Are there any studies that have directly compared the quality of reviews under single blind and double blind review?

May 7, 2013 ... Conclusions. This study demonstrated that at the 1-year follow-up, patients with symptomatic AF and AFL who are treated with AF±AFL ablation ... Dec 13, 2021 ... Microneedling followed by 5-fluorouracil application showed better response than needling alone with minimal side effects and the results were ... single-blind study ... A type of clinical trial in which only the researcher doing the study knows which treatment or intervention the participant is receiving ... In single-blind review, reviewers' identities are blinded—that is, not known to authors—though authors' identities are revealed to reviewers at the time of ... Aug 13, 2024 ... A review of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of conservative interventions for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. ... single-blind study. BMC ... Dec 7, 2018 ... pylori infection. Methods. Study population. A placebo-controlled, single-blind study of Pylopass™ containing L. reuteri ... Sep 22, 2020 ... Differences between Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review. In single-blind peer review, only the reviewers are anonymous. Reviewers know the ... Jun 20, 2019 ... In a single-blind review, the reviewers (or referees) know whose manuscript they are reviewing, but the names of the reviewers are kept secret ... One hundred eighty-six patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain randomly received either the AKA-H method (AKA-H group) or the sham technique (S group) ... ... reviewed via a double-blind review process. Demo papers must be accompanied by a conference demonstration (see details below), and can be reviewed via a single ...