What are the key unanswered questions about the impact and effectiveness of single blind review?

Jan 16, 2017 ... All IOP Publishing journals currently use the conventional “single-blind” peer-review model, in which the reviewer is aware of the author's ... May 7, 2013 ... Conclusions. This study demonstrated that at the 1-year follow-up, patients with symptomatic AF and AFL who are treated with AF±AFL ablation ... Jun 20, 2024 ... Comparing Single-Blind and Double-Blind Approaches. When it comes to mitigating bias, double-blind peer review generally performs better than ... The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a ... Mar 14, 2025 ... The effectiveness of kinesiotaping in treating chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, sham-controlled, single-blind study. Halil Ekrem ... Sep 1, 2016 ... eLife's approach to peer review is more transparent than conventional single-blind peer review and in general helps to facilitate a constructive experience for ... Apr 19, 2024 ... In the single-blind peer review process, reviewers are aware of the authors' identities, but authors remain unaware of who the reviewers are. Nov 21, 2022 ... Study Design and Participants. The study was a single-blind, 3-arm randomized controlled trial performed at a university in Tianjin, China. METHODS: Our research on two different junctional tourniquet models was designed as a prospective randomized, crossover, single-blinded study. All 40 ... Nov 25, 2013 ... It seemed logical to assume that in single blind peer-review, the reviewer should not disclose his identity without the editor's consent.