How can the research community work collaboratively to build a more robust, fair, and effective system of peer review?

Dec 13, 2021 ... Microneedling followed by 5-fluorouracil application showed better response than needling alone with minimal side effects and the results were ... They randomly assign each of the 113 reviewers to give either single- or double- blind reviews, and each paper submission receives at least three single-blind ... Apr 27, 2022 ... Study design and participants. This parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted in patients who had been referred ... Nov 30, 2017 ... Each PC member read his or her assigned papers and entered reviews, again with only single-blind PC members able to see the authors and ... A second objective was to compare open peer review with single-blind peer review. This study was the first to analyse a large number of reviewer reports ... Jan 16, 2017 ... All IOP Publishing journals currently use the conventional “single-blind” peer-review model, in which the reviewer is aware of the author's ... Sep 22, 2020 ... Differences between Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review. In single-blind peer review, only the reviewers are anonymous. Reviewers know the ... Peer review may be “single-blind,” in which reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of paper authors, or “double-blind,” in which this information ... Aug 13, 2024 ... A review of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of conservative interventions for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. ... single-blind study. BMC ... The editor appointed in 1979 returned the journal to a single-blind system. Page 6. 1046 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW DECEMBER 1991 tion continuing through the ...