How can the effectiveness of different peer review models be rigorously evaluated and compared?

Jun 2, 2021 ... STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The selection criteria included randomized controlled trials comparing the double-blind peer review process vs the ... Mar 24, 2021 ... To assess whether the type of peer-review (single-blinded vs double-blinded) has an impact on nationality representation in journals. May 7, 2013 ... Conclusions. This study demonstrated that at the 1-year follow-up, patients with symptomatic AF and AFL who are treated with AF±AFL ablation ... One hundred eighty-six patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain randomly received either the AKA-H method (AKA-H group) or the sham technique (S group) ... Dec 12, 2024 ... A single-blind randomized controlled pilot study on the potential of neuroathletic training for balance ability in stroke outpatient rehabilitation. TIE - Single-Blind review process ... Submission policy has changed on 01 July 2020. TIE has switched to "single-blind" peer review process, where the identities ... Jun 27, 2023 ... I work in life sciences where reviews are usually carried out in a single-blinded fashion. I am currently working on a rebuttal and got ... ... Study protocol of a randomized multicenter, single-blind trial. Registry ... Institutional Approvals: Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee ... Aug 13, 2024 ... A review of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of conservative interventions for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. ... single-blind study. BMC ... Apr 2, 2024 ... Single-blind peer review is commonly used in academic publishing, especially in the sciences and social sciences. In this process, the reviewers ...