What are the key considerations for establishing and maintaining a high-quality peer review process for a new academic journal?

Unblinding that occurs before the conclusion of a study is a source of experimental error, as the bias that was eliminated by blinding is re-introduced. The ... The ethics of single-blind peer review are still a topic of discussion. While reviewers are anonymous, they can see who authors are. So single-blind peer review ... Feb 13, 2013 ... Double-blind reviews imply that both the author and the reviewers are blind, while single-blind reviews imply that reviewers are blind and the author is not. A second objective was to compare open peer review with single-blind peer review. This study was the first to analyse a large number of reviewer reports ... This study has shown interest in evaluating the effects of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on the cognitiveness of individuals with AD. Oct 22, 2020 ... In contrast, single-blind studies are those in which only the respondent is unaware of the sponsor. An example of this study would be a ... Feb 9, 2020 ... Online Posting, Single-Blind Review, Open Access, and the Future of Refereed Journals. Louisa HaView all authors and affiliations. Volume 97 ... Jun 25, 2021 ... A single-blind randomised non-inferiority trial comparing heterologous and homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 ... In single-anonymous, the names of the reviewers are not shared with the author, but the reviewers are aware of the author's identity. In double-anonymous, ... Sep 22, 2017 ... Most papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion—that is, the ... single-blind review. ( Nature 's editors decide whether to send a ...