What are the potential benefits of reviewer knowing author identity in some cases?

Single-blind study ... A single-blind study is a clinical trial design in which in which one party, either the investigator or the participant, does not know ... Jun 20, 2024 ... Comparing Single-Blind and Double-Blind Approaches. When it comes to mitigating bias, double-blind peer review generally performs better than ... Mar 24, 2021 ... We evaluate the emission detection and quantification capabilities of Kairos Aerospace's airplane-based hyperspectral imaging methane emission detection system. Apr 2, 2024 ... Single-blind peer review is commonly used in academic publishing, especially in the sciences and social sciences. In this process, the reviewers ... Jul 22, 2022 ... We have been considering whether ESM should keep using a single-blind review process or turn to a double-blind process. Common types of peer review ... This type of peer review is also called 'single-blind review'. In this model, the reviewers know that you are the author of the ... The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a ... In single-blind review, reviewers' identities are blinded—that is, not known to authors—though authors' identities are revealed to reviewers at the time of ... Jun 17, 2021 ... Conclusion. In this phase II study of two imetelstat doses, 9.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks demonstrated clinical benefits in symptom response rate ... Feb 13, 2018 ... Single-blind peer review is a conventional method of peer review where the authors do not know who the reviewers are. However, the reviewers ...