How can technology be used to foster more collaboration and communication among authors, reviewers, and editors?

The placebo and related effects are central to the single-blind study, and the dangers (or perceived dangers) of bias through participant ... Feb 13, 2013 ... Double-blind reviews imply that both the author and the reviewers are blind, while single-blind reviews imply that reviewers are blind and the author is not. Single-blind study ... A single-blind study is a clinical trial design in which in which one party, either the investigator or the participant, does not know ... Feb 9, 2020 ... Online Posting, Single-Blind Review, Open Access, and the Future of Refereed Journals. Louisa HaView all authors and affiliations. Volume 97 ... Jun 20, 2019 ... In a single-blind review, the reviewers (or referees) know whose manuscript they are reviewing, but the names of the reviewers are kept secret ... Jul 6, 2022 ... Although single-blind peer reviews are the most popular form of peer review, double-blind peer reviews are arguably better. But, according to Brown, the editors felt that trying to hide every single author identity would probably be unsuccessful, and authors too recognizable, to be ... The ethics of single-blind peer review are still a topic of discussion. While reviewers are anonymous, they can see who authors are. So single-blind peer review ... The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a ... Oct 12, 2021 ... (2017) designed a similar experiment where papers submitted to a reputable computer science conference were subjected to both single-blind and ...