How can the public better understand and appreciate the role of peer review?

May 7, 2013 ... Conclusions. This study demonstrated that at the 1-year follow-up, patients with symptomatic AF and AFL who are treated with AF±AFL ablation ... In single-anonymous, the names of the reviewers are not shared with the author, but the reviewers are aware of the author's identity. In double-anonymous, ... Jul 17, 2023 ... Single-, double-, and triple-blinding are commonly used blinding strategies in clinical research. A single-blind study masks the subjects ... The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a ... Feb 18, 2015 ... Since June 2013, Nature Geoscience and Nature Climate Change have allowed authors to choose between double-blind and single-blind peer review at ... Jun 2, 2021 ... STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The selection criteria included randomized controlled trials comparing the double-blind peer review process vs the ... single-blind study ... A type of clinical trial in which only the researcher doing the study knows which treatment or intervention the participant is receiving ... What is the Frontiers peer review model? Frontiers operates a single-blind model during the review process. This means the reviewers know who the authors are in ... Jan 17, 2025 ... ... single-blind feasibility study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05974072). It included 41 participants that were randomly allocated to either the ... Feb 13, 2013 ... Double-blind reviews imply that both the author and the reviewers are blind, while single-blind reviews imply that reviewers are blind and the author is not.