How can the peer review process better address issues of data transparency, reproducibility, and research integrity?

Efficacy and Safety of CBL-514 Injection in Reducing Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study. Michael Gold, MD ... Oct 24, 2023 ... The traditional model is single-blind peer review: the reviewers know the identity of the authors but the authors do not know who the reviewers ... Oct 22, 2020 ... In contrast, single-blind studies are those in which only the respondent is unaware of the sponsor. An example of this study would be a ... Jul 6, 2022 ... Although single-blind peer reviews are the most popular form of peer review, double-blind peer reviews are arguably better. Jun 25, 2021 ... A single-blind randomised non-inferiority trial comparing heterologous and homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 ... Apr 19, 2024 ... In the single-blind peer review process, reviewers are aware of the authors' identities, but authors remain unaware of who the reviewers are. Jun 20, 2019 ... In a single-blind review, the reviewers (or referees) know whose manuscript they are reviewing, but the names of the reviewers are kept secret ... They randomly assign each of the 113 reviewers to give either single- or double- blind reviews, and each paper submission receives at least three single-blind ... METHODS: Our research on two different junctional tourniquet models was designed as a prospective randomized, crossover, single-blinded study. All 40 ... Nov 30, 2017 ... Each PC member read his or her assigned papers and entered reviews, again with only single-blind PC members able to see the authors and ...