How can the peer review process be made more transparent and accountable to the research community and the public?

... study was single blind (expert cytopathologist) and naïve Paris system for urine cytology assessment was used. Furthermore, additional cytological ... One hundred eighty-six patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain randomly received either the AKA-H method (AKA-H group) or the sham technique (S group) ... Apr 19, 2024 ... In the single-blind peer review process, reviewers are aware of the authors' identities, but authors remain unaware of who the reviewers are. IEEE-HPEC paper reviews are to be conducted in a single-blind manner. That is, the reviewers remain anonymous, while the paper author list and author ... Ethics approval This study has been conducted in compliance with local Institutional Review Board policies. ... single-blind observational study on an... Xue Bai, ... Jul 22, 2022 ... We have been considering whether ESM should keep using a single-blind review process or turn to a double-blind process. Single-blind review: Authors identities are revealed to all, but reviewer identities are not revealed to authors (also known as anonymous review); Open review: ... Jun 2, 2021 ... STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The selection criteria included randomized controlled trials comparing the double-blind peer review process vs the ... Oct 24, 2023 ... The traditional model is single-blind peer review: the reviewers know the identity of the authors but the authors do not know who the reviewers ... ... reviewed via a double-blind review process. Demo papers must be accompanied by a conference demonstration (see details below), and can be reviewed via a single ...