How can author identities influence reviewers in single blind review?

Peer review may be “single-blind,” in which reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of paper authors, or “double-blind,” in which this information ... Sep 1, 2016 ... eLife's approach to peer review is more transparent than conventional single-blind peer review and in general helps to facilitate a constructive experience for ... Apr 19, 2024 ... In the single-blind peer review process, reviewers are aware of the authors' identities, but authors remain unaware of who the reviewers are. ... reviewed via a double-blind review process. Demo papers must be accompanied by a conference demonstration (see details below), and can be reviewed via a single ... Blank, Rebecca M, 1991. "The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review," American Economic ... Mar 24, 2021 ... To assess whether the type of peer-review (single-blinded vs double-blinded) has an impact on nationality representation in journals. In single-blind review, reviewers' identities are blinded—that is, not known to authors—though authors' identities are revealed to reviewers at the time of ... Jul 22, 2022 ... We have been considering whether ESM should keep using a single-blind review process or turn to a double-blind process. Jun 2, 2021 ... STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The selection criteria included randomized controlled trials comparing the double-blind peer review process vs the ... Jun 27, 2023 ... I work in life sciences where reviews are usually carried out in a single-blinded fashion. I am currently working on a rebuttal and got ...