What are the principles of the "three Rs" (replacement, reduction, refinement) that guide ethical animal research?

The Naturalistic Fallacy and Theological Ethics.Christian B. Miller - 2018 - In Neil Sinclair, The Naturalistic Fallacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University ... When the conclusion expresses what ought to be, based only on what is, or what ought not to be, based on what is not. This is very common. ... naturalistic fallacy, donor profiles, public communication, and reversibility. ... naturalistic fallacy'. The fallacy, also known as the “is-ought problem ... Apr 10, 2008 ... ... naturalistic fallacy. The naturalistic fallacy is the simple step of expanding “is” into “ought.” “Is” is a positive statement of fact ... Jul 30, 2018 ... But I could surmise that Peterson was simply using the naturalistic fallacy in order to rationalize his pre-existing ideology. If I wanted ... See Gambler's Fallacy. Name Calling. See Ad Hominem. Naturalistic. On a broad interpretation of this fallacy, it applies to any attempt to argue from an “is ... Jun 2, 2011 ... Caldwell, Bruce and Reiss, Julian (2006) Hayek, logic, and the naturalistic fallacy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, ... May 27, 2023 ... Hume's argument was later termed "naturalistic fallacy"; in other words, one cannot infer rules or prescriptive judgments about what ought to be ... Apr 2, 2020 ... ... naturalistic ethics. Naturalistic ethics has a problem of "naturalistic fallacy", and normative ethics also has a problem of "normative ... Oct 19, 2008 ... The naturalistic fallacy, which was coined by the English philosopher George Edward Moore in the early 20th century though first identified much ...