How should we balance the need to protect creators' rights with the public interest in accessing knowledge and innovation?

Feminist critics of evolutionary psychology are often accused of committing the naturalistic fallacy, that is, of inferring certain normative conclusions ... arguing against naturalistic and metaphysical theories. 11. Moore does not yet define naturalism, but it is clear from context that naturalists are defining. Jan 15, 2008 ... In response to the proposal justifying the morality of homosexual acts offered by Todd A. Salzman and Michael G. Lawler, this paper seeks to ... ... Naturalistic Fallacy'. This fallacy – which has been variously understood, but has almost always been seen as something to avoid – was perhaps the greatest ... Many 'natural' things are also considered 'good', and this can bias our thinking; but naturalness itself doesn't make something good or bad. For instance murder ... The naturalistic fallacy is the claim that it is possible to define good in terms of merely described entities, properties, or processes such as pleasant, ... (2) “Darwinian Natural Right and the Naturalistic Fallacy.” A Review of Larry Arnhart, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature. In ... The naturalistic fallacy is an alleged error in ethics, not in logic. Defining "good" as what is natural is, at most, an instance of the naturalistic fallacy. Saint John's wort may treble the activity of CYP3A4 and impair the effect of factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban with potentially serious consequences. The ... The naturalistic fallacy is mentioned frequently by evolutionary psychologists as an erroneous way of thinking about the ethical implications of evolved ...