What are different philosophical perspectives on our moral responsibilities towards the environment and future generations?

The Naturalistic Fallacy and Theological Ethics.Christian B. Miller - 2018 - In Neil Sinclair, The Naturalistic Fallacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University ... Presents a definitive guide to the text, history and philosophy behind the most influential argument in the history of ethics. Oct 19, 2008 ... The naturalistic fallacy, which was coined by the English philosopher George Edward Moore in the early 20th century though first identified much ... Abstract: According to the conventional interpretation of Hume's celebrated passage in the Treatise on “is” and “ought”, no set of nonmoral premises, ... The naturalistic fallacy is an alleged error in ethics, not in logic. Defining "good" as what is natural is, at most, an instance of the naturalistic fallacy. May 27, 2023 ... Hume's argument was later termed "naturalistic fallacy"; in other words, one cannot infer rules or prescriptive judgments about what ought to be ... Apr 10, 2008 ... ... naturalistic fallacy. The naturalistic fallacy is the simple step of expanding “is” into “ought.” “Is” is a positive statement of fact ... Assuming that something that is natural is “right” or “good” is referred to as “the naturalistic fallacy”. Jan 15, 2008 ... In response to the proposal justifying the morality of homosexual acts offered by Todd A. Salzman and Michael G. Lawler, this paper seeks to ... The Naturalistic Fallacy is based on the mistaken notion that you can deduce moral lessons from observing nature... that is, what is natural is morally good. - ...