How should we approach ethical dilemmas that arise in cross-cultural contexts?

Jan 7, 2016 ... Yes, one can argue that the inference of "rights" from "nature" is not empirically valid, and in logic would appear not as a fallacy per se, but as a dubious ... Aug 28, 2017 ... This type of fallacy is called the naturalistic fallacy. But no such fallacy is committed. The movement from a natural is to a moral ought ... Feb 1, 2003 ... Moore famously claimed that naturalists were guilty of what he called the “naturalistic fallacy.” In particular, Moore accused anyone who infers ... (2) “Darwinian Natural Right and the Naturalistic Fallacy.” A Review of Larry Arnhart, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature. In ... Week Two (September 11th and 13th): The Naturalistic Fallacy. Required Readings: Moore, Principia Ethica, §§ 1-17. Frankena, “The Naturalistic Fallacy”. Week ... ... Naturalistic Fallacy'. This fallacy – which has been variously understood, but has almost always been seen as something to avoid – was perhaps the greatest ... Indeed, anyone who reasons in this way is guilty of the naturalistic fallacy. I conclude by saying that properly conceptualized, empirical research and ... Pre-title sequence: naturalistic fallacy. 2. A niche concept focusing on niche specificity. 3. Darwinian evolutionary theory. no-one seems to have drawn attention to some very explicit utter- ances by Mill to the effect that ' ought '-statements were of a differ-. ... naturalistic fallacy valid as a matter of logic. The three systems he investigates are, the Standard Deontic logic, a Relevant Deontic logic, and Schotch ...