Can understanding the neural basis of moral judgments tell us what is actually morally right?

Abstract: According to the conventional interpretation of Hume's celebrated passage in the Treatise on “is” and “ought”, no set of nonmoral premises, ... Certain scholars wish to acquit St. Thomas Aquinas of the “illicit inference from facts to norms” commonly referred to as the naturalistic fallacy. Seeing in ... Apr 22, 2022 ... The Naturalistic Fallacy is about the naturalistic fallacy in a broad sense and its meaning, merits, legacy, and implications. Readers of ... Jan 7, 2016 ... Yes, one can argue that the inference of "rights" from "nature" is not empirically valid, and in logic would appear not as a fallacy per se, but as a dubious ... The Naturalistic Fallacy rules out any attempt to treat morality as defined according to some pre-existent reality. Abstract. The naturalistic fallacy appears to be ubiquitous and irresistible. The avant-garde and the rearguard, the devout and the secular, the learned elite ... May 2, 2013 ... This book describes the "naturalistic fallacy", as attributed to Hume, that non-moral premises cannot logically entail a moral conclusion, ... Aug 28, 2017 ... This type of fallacy is called the naturalistic fallacy. But no such fallacy is committed. The movement from a natural is to a moral ought ... Play Quordle: Guess all four words in a limited number of tries. Each of. Can you solve 4 words at once? A naturalistic fallacy is an argument that concludes that because an outcome or action is influenced by nature, then it must be good. One example of a ...