What are some of the most influential critiques and defenses of Moore's analysis of the naturalistic fallacy?

NATURALISTIC FALLACY definition: the supposed fallacy of inferring evaluative conclusions from purely factual premises | Meaning, pronunciation, ... Mar 17, 2023 ... Community Answer ... The argument that commits the naturalistic fallacy is the one that states 'we should not eat meat because humans are designed ... May 2, 2013 ... This book describes the "naturalistic fallacy", as attributed to Hume, that non-moral premises cannot logically entail a moral conclusion, ... a causal fallacy. Reality check: While it would ... Reality check: The use of the word “natural” in this manner implies that vaccines are not safe because. The naturalistic fallacy (NF) refers to "is-ought" confusions in which empirical descriptions of nature are seen as dictating moral conclusions. Apr 22, 2022 ... The Naturalistic Fallacy is about the naturalistic fallacy in a broad sense and its meaning, merits, legacy, and implications. Readers of ... Jan 7, 2016 ... Yes, one can argue that the inference of "rights" from "nature" is not empirically valid, and in logic would appear not as a fallacy per se, but as a dubious ... Abstract. David Hume famously argued that we cannot logically move from sentences about how the world is, to sentences about how it ought to be. Doing so has ... Pre-title sequence: naturalistic fallacy. 2. A niche concept focusing on niche specificity. 3. Darwinian evolutionary theory. 1 - The Naturalistic Fallacy and the History of Metaethics pp 9-29 Access 2 - The Naturalistic Fallacy: What It Is, and What It Isn't pp 30-53 Access