What are the exceptions to the rule that the Court of Appeal is bound by its own decisions?

The doctrine of precedent is the fundamental basis of the law applied by the judiciary, which specifies that a court should apply the rulings of previous cases. Nov 27, 2023 ... Case precedents that courts are bound to follow in subsequent cases are referred to as mandatory or binding authority. Feb 13, 2022 ... The published opinions of the Court are binding precedent until overruled by the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court has recognized that ... Feb 27, 2024 ... Decisions of higher courts become a binding precedent for lower courts within their geographic region. Lower courts must follow binding ... Apr 10, 2024 ... Although Binding Precedent 10 was issued by the Supreme Court more than 15 years ago, there are still judges who fail to observe it and lawyers ... Binding precedent refers to a legal principle or rule established in a previous court case that must be followed by lower courts in future cases with similar ... Jul 3, 2007 ... Whether the ruling of the Western Section Court of Appeals in Wells v. Wharton, 2005 WL. 3309651 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005), sets a binding precedent ... Apr 25, 2023 ... Normally, decisions of a District Court of Appeal are not binding on lower courts outside of its jurisdiction, but there is a notable exception ... These decisions do not bind the court to a particular interpretation of the law, nor do they make law. In fact, in some jurisdictions employing a version of. Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ...