What are the different philosophical perspectives on the justification for binding precedent?

The Board resolves some appeals by issuing dispositive orders. These orders are final for the Department, but they do not serve as binding precedent in other ... An order that is a final Supreme Court disposition of an application and that contains a concise statement of the applicable facts and reasons for the decision ... These decisions do not bind the court to a particular interpretation of the law, nor do they make law. In fact, in some jurisdictions employing a version of. ... binding doctrine of precedent within the arbitration mechanism. By understanding the present use of precedent along with its benefits and costs, it becomes ... Sep 5, 2012 ... Decisions of the Appellate Term are not binding on the Supreme Court, even if issued within the same judicial department. Oct 13, 2016 ... TC opinions are binding, precedential, and published by the Tax Court. They generally address issues of first impression, issues that impact a large number of ... A precedent is 'binding' on a court if the precedent was made by a superior court that is higher in the hierarchy of courts. A binding precedent must be ... 4 days ago ... If a case has been decided on a certain legal principle previously, that becomes the binding precedent which a later court has to follow. From ... Jan 10, 2025 ... Whether the Supreme Court could employ its supervisory power to impose a binding, vertical precedent about horizontal precedent is another ... Oct 16, 2023 ... The US Supreme Court is an exception in that its precedent is binding on all US courts, both state and federal. Determining when a court is ...