How might future legal challenges and developments (e.g., in areas like technology or human rights) test the flexibility and adaptability of the system of binding precedent?

Feb 1, 2023 ... ... binding precedent for lower courts. Whether language in an appellate opinion was central to the decision or only an afterthought, zealous ... Jan 10, 2025 ... Whether the Supreme Court could employ its supervisory power to impose a binding, vertical precedent about horizontal precedent is another ... Michigan Supreme Court orders “that include a decision with an understandable rationale establish binding precedent.” People v Giovannini, 271 Mich App 409 ... Thus, a decision by the California Supreme Court is binding on all lower courts. 1. Page 3. All state cow1s also are bound by United States Supreme Court ... Binding precedent. Precedent that a court must abide by in its adjudication of a case. For example, a lower court is bound by the decision of a higher ... 1 The Eleventh Circuit has adopted as binding precedent all Fifth Circuit decisions issued before October 1, 1981, as well as all decisions issued after ... Binding precedent. adjective. Following the decisions made by higher courts. Lower courts must follow the precedents set by the decisions of higher courts and ... The beginning of wisdom may be to recognize the variety of problems that arise in common law systems concerning application of precedents. ... precedent without a formal stare decisis rule. In theory the AB has a rule against binding precedent. Based on empirical evidence, however, this Article ... Binding precedent is a legal rule made by a higher court that lower courts must follow. When a higher court decides a case, it writes down its decision in a ...