How does the structure of judicial decisions (e.g., judgment, reasoning) facilitate the identification of binding precedent?

The Board resolves some appeals by issuing dispositive orders. These orders are final for the Department, but they do not serve as binding precedent in other ... Settled law” appears frequently in judicial opinions—sometimes to refer to binding precedent, sometimes to denote precedent that has acquired a more ... The legal principle of precedent requires that a prior decision be treated as binding even if the current decision maker disagrees with that decision. Mar 3, 2009 ... We know of no precedent for the proposition that when a plaintiff has sued to challenge the lawfulness of certain action or threatened ... Nov 4, 2010 ... USCIS has announced that two decisions from its Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) will be binding precedent for the agency. Jul 18, 2024 ... Precedent decisions are legally binding on the DHS components responsible for enforcing immigration laws in all proceedings involving the ... Under stare decisis, courts are obliged to follow some precedents, but not others. Because of the many layers of our federal system, it can be difficult to ... Sep 20, 2024 ... The opinion of an appellate court is binding precedent (mandatory authority) for all lower courts in its jurisdiction. For example, a South ... Binding precedent. Precedent that a court must abide by in its adjudication of a case. For example, a lower court is bound by the decision of a higher ... Binding precedent is a legal rule made by a higher court that lower courts must follow. When a higher court decides a case, it writes down its decision in a ...