How does the doctrine of binding precedent interact with the principle of proportionality in law?

The judgment of the Full Bench is binding precedent as it expresses the collective opinion of the Court as such precedent, the decision will be either binding on the later decision, or only persuasive. A binding precedent must be followed by the later case; a ... Unlike a merely per- suasive proposition, a binding proposition requires a judge to show some- thing more than disagreement in order to justify departing from ... Aug 26, 2024 ... Special prosecutor Jack Smith on Monday accused US District Judge Aileen Cannon of overlooking “binding Supreme Court precedent” when she decided to dismiss ... Binding precedent refers to a legal principle or rule established in a previous court case that must be followed by lower courts in future cases with similar ... ... binding doctrine of precedent within the arbitration mechanism. By understanding the present use of precedent along with its benefits and costs, it becomes ... Feb 4, 2017 ... The jurors determine the facts and reach a verdict, within the guidelines of the law as determined by the judge. Feb 13, 2022 ... The published opinions of the Court are binding precedent until overruled by the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court has recognized that ... Mar 26, 2016 ... A binding precedent is a ruling that must be followed because of the authority of the issuing court over the following court. Michigan Supreme Court orders “that include a decision with an understandable rationale establish binding precedent.” People v Giovannini, 271 Mich App 409 ...